Peter Heath. |
His email carried
an outline short route and a suggested time. Being Peter, it was an
imperative suggestion “I'll come to your house on Friday afternoon,
I'll phone first ” it ended. Then, on the day, the call. “What
do you think?” he asked “Weather seems fine” I said. He turned
up at 2pm and barked “Now, you're still happy to do the ride round
to Woolpit?” . . . “Yup” Say I, . . . “RIGHT! Off
we go” says Pete.
. .pausing to
check traffic. . . .
“ALL CLEAR!!,” ….. and he twiddled off our forecourt and up the
A1088 at what felt to me like a positively Wigginsian pace – and
I'd yet to get my second foot in. I was already chasing and it was
only the first few yards of our ride! How would I cope? But I was
back on, just before the left turn to Thurston, “I caught up” I
said “only because I waited!” Peter barked with a grin,
and we cruised down to the hump
back bridge over the Blackbourne (well, Peter cruised, and had no
reason to doubt that I was doing any different). We discussed
drainage, and the whereabouts of my new running route which used a
brand new wooden pedestrian bridge over the Blackbourne and then
followed a footpath and a Byway up the top of the climb to Great
Green Thurston (on my run, I turn round and go back down hill to
home, and a bath. No chance this afternoon). We climb (don't laugh
)on the road to the Z bend at the top, and turn left towards Tostock.
A hundred yards along the lane, past the excellent new house
belonging to Harvey's Nursery, we pass the opening to 'my' Byway. We
discuss Barn Owls, and marvel at the amount of standing water along
'my' route today. I relish hearing the sharp cries of warning from
Peter “car behind!” “hole!” and “puddle!”. This is a
proper ride. We go over the railway bridge, commenting on the newly
restored Victorian houses on the right. Peter tells me that the
railway is where Thurston officially ends. This was a surprise to me,
as one who only recently aware that Great Green was IN Thurston. So
on we went. Side by side along the lane to Tostock, down into the dip
with another double bend then up through the lovely woodland to the
junction. Then right ande left, then right again along the lane to
Drinkstone, down past the windmills, the left and in to Woolpit.
After a detour to the Health Centre (to collect Peter's drugs – I
didn't ask), we stopped for tea in Woolpit and discussed post
traumatic whatnots, over tea and cake and scones. In an act of
almost excessive generosity Peter insisted that I have the only
remaining scone, and that he
paid for the entire repast.
Sharon & Rob at Thetford GC |
This account, written in January 2013, has been
delayed whilst I try to decide what form the blog should take. I
began straightforwardly enough - 'pretty major prang' is the default,
laconic, approach. But then there's a rather more to say, really.
Cyclists, and probably all who do sports with an accident risk, tend
to have a fairly casual approach to the inevitable damage of scars,
bumps, bruises and grazes. Most injuries do heal pretty quickly.
It's when one breaks bones or get's a bump on the head that matters
become more complex. And for me that complexity has had a rather long
term impact. Our Club Orthopaedic Surgeon, Soren Sjolin had warned
me, as he chatted from my bedside at West Suffolk, that it might take
me three months to recover. As any seasoned cyclist would, I thought
to myself "I'll keep quite, but that can't be right".
Now, in the middle of January and with plenty of
time to think, I feel that "Maybe Soren was right after all"
was probably the more accurate choice. Then the know-all,
argumentative Bikie in me revised his opinion of Soren's judgement –
aha! He thought. Soren was wrong after all. Three months?
Optimistic nonsense. Closer to five is likely (Sorry Soren). The
effects of the impact include a slight (but diminishing) problem with
balance. So until yesterday (and there's more of that later) I only
rode my road bike on the turbo (and even then I ran out of commitment
after 30 minutes, and then several days to regain that commitment).
The main advantage of sticking to the turbo was that I was less
likely to fall over (not, I hasten to add, that I actually have
fallen). I had tried the odd test in our garden, and the tendency to
waver in the direction of the leg being swung over the bike was
rather too pronounced for comfort. Before Christmas I began an heroic
session of 10 min turbo warm-up on ATB (v effective, if anyone's
interested) followed by my 5k off road run (at extremely gentle
pace). Then it froze, then I got the seasonally obligatory cold
followed by chest infection followed by Christmas - and now I'm back
on (though not in) the running. An advantage of
off-road running is that falling over is less likely - though in the
early stages I was unnervingly wobbly. Another post traumatic effect
(getting cod medico-technical now) is fatigue. Many attempts at
physical or mental effort have been sabotaged over the last four
months by the need for slumber. There's been a general slowing up (I
rely on my wife Susan for opinions about what proportion of these
shortcomings is due solely to being 69, or to a whack on the head)
reading is slow, spelling a lot worse, memory has, er, um . . . . oh
you know!. Now that I've moved into a more general discussion of all
this, I might as well mention the mood swings and emotional
incontinence. Or perhaps not.
This last section is one of the dangers of writing
the blog - being boring about my health. I'm sure there will be
readers who will criticise me for giving too much detail or a
flippant lack of, erm, seriousness.
SJH